Trump’s Plans for the DOJ: Power, Payback, and Control
Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed a desire for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to act in his favor—particularly by investigating or prosecuting his political opponents. His reasoning, according to public statements and reporting, stems from a mix of retaliation, strategic control, and political messaging:
Retaliation for Past Investigations
Trump has claimed that the DOJ was “weaponized” against him during the Biden administration, citing his multiple indictments for business fraud, mishandling classified documents, and election interference. He argues that these were politically motivated attacks, and has said that if he’s president again, he has the right to “go after them” in return.
Propaganda Strategy: “Accusation in a Mirror”
Experts suggest Trump uses a tactic called “accusation in a mirror”, where he accuses others of doing what he plans to do himself. By claiming the DOJ was politicized against him, he builds a narrative that justifies politicizing it in his own favor. This technique has historically been used by authoritarian regimes to normalize controversial actions.
Plans to Restructure DOJ
Reports indicate Trump and his allies have developed plans to reshape the DOJ. He is treating it like any other cabinet agency under direct presidential control. This would allow him to direct investigations and prosecutions personally. He’s reportedly told advisors he wants to target critics, including former officials like Jack Smith, Bill Barr, and even President Biden.
Firing and Replacing DOJ Officials
Since returning to office, Trump has fired or reassigned DOJ lawyers involved in previous investigations against him. He’s installed loyalists and threatened disciplinary action against attorneys who don’t align with his agenda. This mirrors tactics used during the Nixon era, such as the “Saturday Night Massacre,” but with far less public backlash.
Public Messaging and Base Mobilization
Trump’s claims about DOJ “corruption” and “injustice” are also part of his broader messaging strategy. By portraying himself as a victim of a biased legal system. He rallies support from his base and frames any future legal action as justified retribution.